- Deutsch Was Putins Invasion für die Zukunft der Schweiz bedeutet (original)
- Español Qué supone la invasión de Putin para el futuro de Suiza
- Português O que significa a invasão de Putin para o futuro da Suíça
- 中文 普京的侵略战争对中立国瑞士的未来意味着什么？
- عربي ما الذي يعنيه غزو بوتين لأوكرانيا بالنسبة لمستقبل سويسرا
- Pусский Что означает вторжение Путина в Украину для будущего Швейцарии?
- 日本語 ウクライナ侵攻で中立国スイスはどう変わる？
Neutral Switzerland has taken a clear position with its unprecedented sanctions against Russia. This has far-reaching consequences for its policy towards China and Europe. An analysis.
When a United States president talks about Switzerland in the middle of a war in Ukraine, then something extraordinary must have happened. “Even Switzerland are inflicting pain on Russia and supporting the people of Ukraine,” Joe Biden told Congress on March 1.
The New York Times even responded with “breaking news” on the Swiss government’s decision to join the sanctions against Russia. Switzerland is “setting aside a deeply rooted tradition of neutrality,” the paper said. The state-owned broadcaster Russia Today spoke of a “significant break” with neutrality. In Switzerland, the rightwing Swiss People’s Party made a similar statement.
And it’s true -- Switzerland has reached a watershed moment in its foreign policy. But where does this step lead? Does it mean an end to Swiss neutrality? Here is an attempt to clarify this in seven points.
1. Switzerland remains militarily neutral
The comments from The New York Times, Russia Today and the Swiss People’s Party are misleading: even after the government’s decision, Switzerland remains militarily neutral. International law lays down only a few duties for a neutral state. It cannot support any party with soldiers or arms. It cannot make its territory available to a warring party. And it cannot join any military alliance. All that remains the case.
The Swiss position therefore differs markedly from that of Sweden, which is (so far) also neutral. But now Sweden is even sending weapons to Ukraine and flirting with the idea of joining NATO. Neither is an option for Switzerland at present.
2. The government has radicalised its previous policy
Neutrality is not damaged by the government’s decision. It does however affect neutrality in a broader sense. The principle behind this: a state which wants to remain neutral in war generally behaves in such a way that people get why it’s neutral in an emergency. And, politically, Switzerland wants to behave in a way that allows it to act as a mediator in conflicts.
But what Switzerland may or may not do in terms of its neutrality policy is not carved into the Matterhorn. It always depends on the international environment – and on the particular individual case. Basically, neutrality does not stop Switzerland from robustly representing its values in the world. And taking part in economic sanctions is not prohibited either.
For the last 200 years, the interpretation of neutrality has constantly changed – before 1990, Switzerland didn’t even apply United Nations sanctions. The Russia case is therefore not a break with previous policy. But it is an unprecedented escalation.
3. Neutrality is not a maxim of state
The national constitution doesn’t mention neutrality as the state’s purpose or in its foreign policy goals, but only as a political instrument. Goals such as observing human rights, promoting democracy and the peaceful coexistence of peoples are given much more weight. If neutrality clashes with these values, then Switzerland has to weigh up its priorities.
"Sanctioning Russia is not a breach of neutrality. Failing to sanction Russia would have been a breach of neutrality."End of insertion
4. Not imposing sanctions would be a breach of neutrality
In many wars, it is not very clear who is the perpetrator and who the victim. In the Ukraine war, however, it is legally unambiguous: Russia is the aggressor, Ukraine is the victim. Vladimir Putin has violated countless articles of the United Nations charter, while Ukraine is only exercising its right to self-defence. Anyone who doesn’t take a stance in such a case is an accomplice of the perpetrator.
That is truer for Switzerland than for other countries. Some 80% of Russian commodities trade is conducted through Switzerland and 30% of the foreign assets of Russian individuals and companies are deposited in Swiss banks. If Switzerland had eschewed sanctions, it would be a war profiteer. In summary, sanctioning Russia is not a breach of neutrality. Failing to sanction Russia would have been a breach of neutrality.
5. The government had no alternative
International pressure was mounting. If Switzerland had not agreed to impose sanctions, it might itself have been subject to sanctions by the US and European Union. It is possible that such a decision would have made any kind of mediation role for Switzerland in Ukraine impossible. That would have been extremely regrettable collateral damage.
6. This is a precedent
No matter how few alternatives to this decision the government had, it could be a watershed - because Switzerland has effectively aligned itself with the western coalition of EU and NATO states. That is a precedent for further, similar catastrophes threatening the world. It is to be feared that China will at some point try to annex the island republic of Taiwan. Following the logic of the Russia example, Switzerland would then have to impose sanctions on China.
7. An agreement with the EU is becoming ever more urgent
For Switzerland, there is a danger that the world will consolidate into hostile political and economic blocs as a result of the war in Ukraine. That would mean that Europe’s importance for the Swiss economy would grow. It is therefore all the more important that the government and parliament work to stabilise relations with the EU quickly. An agreement with the EU on institutional questions has become much more urgent after Putin’s invasion
This article first appeared in the Tages-Anzeiger on March 2, 2022External link, and has been republished here with kind permission.
Translated from German by Catherine Hickley
In compliance with the JTI standards