Stepping up wastewater treatment

Bubbling ozone gas through wastewater is one way to neutralise micropollutants – a growing environmental threat. Eawag

Are systems designed to remove micropollutants from wastewater treatment plants enough to protect lakes and rivers? That’s what the Swiss government is betting on.

This content was published on October 11, 2016

Many of us think nothing of flushing some expired medication, washing our faces with a fancy foaming cleanser, or attacking a mouldy shower with a heavy-duty detergent. But putting these substances down the drain can harm the environment, just like tossing litter onto the ground can.

Many pharmaceuticals, personal care products and household chemicals contain compounds called “micropollutants”. The term can describe microscopic traces of chemicals, or pollutants that are visible to the human eye, such as bits of plastic or foam under 5mm in diameter. They are also found in industrial fertilizers and pesticides.

Once they enter the sewage system, micropollutants make their way to wastewater treatment plants (known in French-speaking cantons as 'stations d’épuration des eaux', or STEPs) with the rest of urban waste. Problem solved, right?

External Content

Wrong. According to the Swiss environment ministry’s National Surface Water Quality Monitoring Programme, wastewater treatment plants in Switzerland allow most micropollutants to pass through untreated – and can even exacerbate micropollutant contamination.

“Many substances used in daily life end up in wastewater and go into rivers. If you look at measurements in the Rhine river for example, you see more and more substances in higher and higher concentrations as you go downstream,” says Christian Abegglen. 

That’s bad news, because micropollutants are harmful to aquatic ecosystems. Fish are especially susceptible, because they consume micropollutants and the endocrine-disrupting chemicalsExternal link they contain –  either inadvertently or because they mistake them for food – resulting in serious harm to their growth and reproductive cycles.

There are no documented negative effects on human health due to micropollutants. But as Abegglen – an engineer at Switzerland's largest wastewater treatment plant, the Werdhölzli STEP in Zurich – puts it: “many rivers are used as drinking water sources, and these substances do not belong in drinking water.”

A final STEP

A 2007 aerial view of the Werdhözli STEP in Zurich. In 2018, the facility should complete the installation of an ozonation system on its western end by the Limmat River. Keystone

Because micropollutants are very small and present in low concentrations, they can easily sneak through STEP wastewater filters. Worse, the microbes that STEPs use to break down organic waste cannot digest the chemicals in micropollutants. The upshot is that STEPs end up releasing contaminated water into lakes and rivers.

Abegglen leads a Swiss Wastewater AssociationExternal link team dedicated to facilitating a Swiss government programme to equip 100 STEPs with anti-micropollutant technologies. The goal of the programme, which came into force on January 1 2016, is for each STEP to filter out 80% of all micropollutants.

An ozonation system, as pictured at the Neugut STEP in Dübendorf, canton Zurich. eawag/Aldo Todaro

To achieve this goal at the Werdhölzli STEP, which serves roughly 440,000 people, construction is underway to install a process called ozonation.

"Ozone is an aggressive gas. We add it to the cleaned wastewater, and it then attacks the micropollutants and actually destroys the molecules. There are some fragments leftover, which are less toxic or non-toxic, and so the negative effects that we see in the wastewater after that are gone,” Abegglen explains.

Ozone gas is generated from oxygen and electricity at the STEP. After being used to treat the wastewater, the gas is completely removed, and only oxygen is expelled at the end of the cycle. It’s a clean and effective process, but there are drawbacks: it is energy-intensive, and can leave behind harmful by-products such as bromate, which must be tightly controlled.

When construction is finished in 2018, the Zurich facility will join two other successfully retrofitted STEPs in Dübendorf, canton Zurich, and Herisau, canton Appenzell Outer-Rhodes.

A drop in the ocean

For Shannon and Roger Erismann, leaders of a volunteer water pollution monitoring project called hammerdirt.chExternal link, there’s a bigger picture to be addressed when it comes to protecting Swiss waterways: the thousands of pieces of trash that are dumped into lakes and rivers daily.

“Micropollutants are hugely important. But if we’re pretending in Switzerland that we can model the human brainExternal link, why can’t we solve the problem of the cigarette butt in the water?” asks Roger.

One problem, the Erismanns explain, is that larger pieces of litter – in addition to acting as pollutants themselves – degrade into tiny particles that accumulate more chemicals over time.

Roger and Shannon Erismann of pose with a sampling of litter found on the shores of Lac Leman (Lake Geneva).

“All it does is get finer and finer. And all of the sudden it’s a micropollutant,” says Shannon.

The Montreux-based couple say they regularly pick up between 60 and 70 different types of trash, which they sort and count, posting the data on their webpage.

Most of the waste comes from litter dropped into gutters, agricultural and construction site runoff, and overflow from the STEPs themselves.

"Sewer overflows and wastewater bypasses discharge untreated sewage into streams, rivers, and lakes – primarily during wet weather events,” says Shannon. “Feminine hygiene products, cotton bud sticks and other toilet bowl items found in or along the lake are indicators that raw sewage has been diverted to our waterways."

Christian Abegglen confirms that STEPs divert 1-3% of raw wastewater during periods of rain to avoid overflow.

“We can’t handle all the water that comes into the system, otherwise the channels would be too big and very expensive,” he explains.

“People can support us by not throwing things into the toilet that should go into the trash, like pharmaceuticals.”

For the Erismanns, developing long-term solutions to Swiss water quality problems depends on reliable monitoring – both of pollution data, and of intervention efforts such as the STEP retrofit programme.

“All this trash is part of a larger system, and once it gets into the water, it is a failure of the system,” says Roger. “If we look at litter as part of a larger system, then maybe we can find a solution.”

Pollution plan

On July 14, the National Surface Water Quality Monitoring Programme (NAWA) released a comprehensive study on the health of Swiss waterways.

The verdict: of 111 sites sampled between 2011 and 2014, 30% qualified as “seriously degraded” in terms of their ability to support their natural biological and ecological functions – from serving as a rich habitat for fish and other aquatic organisms, to providing safe drinking water for humans.

The Swiss government programme to upgrade 100 STEPs near some of the nation’s most heavily used waterways is the result to a modification of the federal law on water protection. The project is expected to cost CHF 1.2 billion ($1.2 billion), and its financing model includes a wastewater tax of up to CHF 9 per person until 2040. The tax will be removed once adaptation of the STEPs is complete.

Selected STEPs can choose between two micropollutant-fighting technologies (or a combination of the two): powdered active charcoal, which physically traps pollutant molecules in a carbon filter; and ozonation, which does not remove pollutants, but renders them chemically inert by oxidising them with ozone gas.

End of insertion

“That doesn’t go in the sewer!”

The Bachwis STEP in Herisau offers the following list to help citizens remember what should not go down the drain:

  • Solids, textiles, disposable diapers, cotton wool and cotton buds
  • Scraps of food
  • Edible fats and oils
  • Motor oil
  • Paint thinner and gasoline
  • Dyes
  • Drugs
  • Toxins and chemicals
  • Cement wastewater
End of insertion

What do you think is the best way to target micropollutant contamination in lakes and rivers? Share your ideas and opinions in the comments!

In compliance with the JTI standards

In compliance with the JTI standards

More: SWI certified by the Journalism Trust Initiative

Contributions under this article have been turned off. You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here. Please join us!

If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at

Sort by

Change your password

Do you really want to delete your profile?

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Almost finished... We need to confirm your email address. To complete the subscription process, please click the link in the email we just sent you.

Weekly top stories

Keep up to date with the best stories from SWI on a range of topics, straight into your mailbox.


The SBC Privacy Policy provides additional information on how your data is processed.